The Garner Lawyer

Legal Musings from the Suburbs

The Wrong Way to Declare Bankruptcy

December 11, 2014 Posted by | Bankruptcy | | Leave a comment

Legal Whom?

The Perry Mason box set, however, should get you right up to speed.

The Perry Mason box set, however, should get you right up to speed.

A disturbing trend has emerged in recent years. A lot of people, in order to save a few hundred dollars, have started bargain shopping for legal services the same way they would for toilet paper or other household items.  From online “self-help” websites like Legal Zoom, to “document preparation services” you can visit in person, to fill-in-the-blank “kits” you can buy at an office supply store (seriously), there are apparently plenty of people out there who would put their whole future and that of their children at risk to save a relatively modest amount of money.  Let me put this bluntly:  no matter how many episodes of Matlock you’ve seen, there’s still a decent chance you’re going to screw this up by trying to do it yourself.

It doesn’t take much searching to find plenty of examples of documents being drafted incorrectly, sometimes with very serious consequences. Yes, sometimes attorneys make mistakes.  But you know what you get if I draft your document incorrectly?  You get to file a claim with my malpractice insurance company and ask them for a big check to make it right.

If you use Legal Zoom to draft your documents and they aren’t done right, you can forget about filing a claim with anyone. You see, Legal Zoom has a disclaimer which says it’s not their fault.  What’s not their fault?  Nothing is their fault.  Here’s one special part of their disclaimer:

“The information on this site is not legal advice and is not guaranteed to be correct, complete or up-to-date.”

Well, that makes me feel secure. It’s almost like the site was co-founded by a member of the O.J. Simpson defense team.  Oh wait, it was.  Here’s another gem from the disclaimer:

“LegalZoom is not responsible for any loss, injury, claim, liability, or damage related to your use of this site, whether from errors or omissions in the content of our site, from the site being down or from any other use of the site.”

I also co-founded shoedazzle.com with Kim Kardashian so you're in good hands.

I also co-founded shoedazzle.com with Kim Kardashian so you’re in good hands.

Translation: “Even if there’s a mistake on our site, we’re not responsible for any of the consequences caused by that mistake, even though we took your money in return for our product.  Sorry, not our problem.  Good luck with the mess we helped create.”

The disclaimer ends with this sentence that sums it all up:

“In short, your use of the site is at your own risk.”

Translation:   “Thanks for the money, you’re on your own, buddy.”

As an actual attorney, I’m not allowed to tell clients that their use of my services is at their own risk. It’s at my risk, too, because I have a law license I use to feed my family.  If I make mistakes, the State Bar can take that license away from me and put me out of business.  How careful will the Legal Zoom folks be when they have absolutely nothing to lose if they make a mistake?

Even if you’ve seen “A Few Good Men” or “My Cousin Vinny” ten times, do you really want to bet your future on your legal knowledge with nobody to stand behind you if you make a mistake? Or would you rather make that bet with the assistance of a trained and experienced attorney with his livelihood on the line and insurance to cover the rare mistake?  Do-it-yourself is great for building a mailbox or birdhouse, not for complicated legal documents.  Before you decide lawyers are too expensive, call around and see how much something is really going to cost you.  Chances are, it’s probably pretty cheap compared to the dire consequences that could result from going it alone.

November 30, 2014 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

You Can’t Disinherit Your Spouse in North Carolina

wife kick cartoonHe can lie to you, cheat on you, even beat you and your kids, but you still can’t cut your husband out of your estate in North Carolina.  Even if you write a Will specifically stating that your spouse is to receive nothing if you die, your husband or wife is still entitled to claim a significant percentage of your assets if you pass away while you are still legally married.

Under North Carolina law, a surviving spouse who is left out of a Will can file one form with the court and the law awards that spouse what’s called his or her “elective share” of your estate.  The amount the spouse receives can vary depending on whether the deceased spouse is also survived by children.

The Elizabeth Edwards Example

Elizabeth Edwards, the wife of former U.S. Senator John Edwards, died from cancer on December 7, 2010.  Following the disclosure of Senator Edwards’ affair, John and Elizabeth had separated eleven months earlier.  Six days before her death, Elizabeth Edwards reportedly changed her Will to cut John Edwards out completely and give all of her assets to her children.  However, because the Edwards had not been separated a full year, they could not divorce yet, and unless both had signed a separation agreement preventing him from doing so, John Edwards could have claimed a share of Elizabeth’s estate even though she clearly didn’t want him to receive anything (I have no idea if he actually claimed his surviving spouse’s share or not).

Solutions?

While there wasn’t anything Elizabeth Edwards could do unilaterally to solve the problem described above, there are a few things you can do to try and avoid a similar dilemma:

1.  Sign a Separation Agreement – A common provision in most separation agreements takes away the ability of either party to claim their surviving spouse’s share of the other’s estate.  The Edwards may have had such an agreement (we don’t really know), but because both spouses must agree to sign a separation agreement, this isn’t always possible.

bride kick groom2.  Get Divorced Already! – I can’t even count the number of times I’ve had clients tell me that they have been separated from their spouse for 5, 10, even 20 years or more, but have never actually gotten divorced.  A divorce automatically eliminates that spouse’s right to claim any part of your estate, so if you’ve been separated for more than a year (Elizabeth Edwards was still one month short when she died), you can avoid this issue by just filing the paperwork and getting divorced.

3.  Lobby the State House – To most people, the full year separation statute in North Carolina probably seems a bit old-fashioned.  Most states allow couples to get divorced more quickly, and the North Carolina Legislature could certainly shorten the required separation period at any time.  Unfortunately, and somewhat unbelievably, in the current political climate in this state, it appears that a longer separation requirement may be more likely than a shorter one, so for the time being you would be better advised to seek out one of the other suggestions listed above.

June 4, 2013 Posted by | Wills & Estates | , , , , | Leave a comment

Things You Can Drive Drunk in North Carolina

No, I’m not encouraging anybody to drive anything under the influence, but it’s curious how the state legislature has made distinctions among different methods of conveyance when it comes to driving while impaired laws.  According to the law, it’s perfectly legal to use the following three ways of getting around when you’re smashed:

There no law against the horse being drunk.

There’s no law against the horse being drunk either.

Horses:  When writing the DWI statute, the state legislature chose to specifically carve out an exception that allows you to ride a horse drunk (N.G.G.S § 20-138.1(e)).  You can’t get drunk and ride a bicycle down the road, but you absolutely CAN get drunk and ride a horse down the road.  That makes no sense to me, but obviously the alcoholic cowboy lobby has a lot more influence over at the state house than I would have thought.

Wheelchairs:  The driving while impaired statute also contains a specific exception, in the way the word “vehicle” is defined (N.G.G.S §20-4.01(49)), for driving a motorized wheelchair drunk.  You can’t drive a golf cart down the road drunk.  You can’t ride a lawnmower down the road drunk.  But, if your mobility is impaired (note: it’s unclear if this includes being too drunk to stand up), the North Carolina General Assembly thought it was important to give you the right to get loaded and go for a cruise around town in your motorized wheelchair.  I always thought those elderly ladies yelling “Hoveround!” in that commercial seemed like they were having a little too much fun and now I know why.

I've made a huge mistake.

“I’ve made a huge mistake.”

Segways:  The North Carolina Court of Appeals has determined (State v. Crow, 623 S.E.2d 68 (2005)) that riding a motorized scooter with handlebars drunk subjects you to a DWI charge, but riding a Segway drunk does not.  The decision is based on the legislature’s odd exception to the DWI laws for “electric personal assistive mobility devices” which are specifically excluded from the definition of a “vehicle” (N.G.G.S § 20-4.01(49)).  The applicable part of the definition of such a device is that it must be “a self-balancing nontandem two-wheeled device” ((N.G.G.S § 20-4.01(7a)).  According to the Court, a Segway meets that definition, but a motorized scooter is neither self-balancing nor nontandem (it is tandem because the wheels are one behind the other).  Based on that bizarre technical requirement, your Segway tour of Raleigh can include stops at every bar in town, but if you did the same thing on a motorized scooter, you would be arrested.

Disclaimer:  This article should not be construed as an encouragement for anyone reading it to get hammered and then ride horses, wheelchairs or Segways out into traffic.  If you have been consuming alcohol, you should stay away from the road regardless of the circumstances, even if you’re one of the alcoholic cowboys who apparently run this state.

March 24, 2013 Posted by | Criminal law | , , | 2 Comments

Basic Estate Advice

If a family member or friend has passed away and you are going to be acting as the Executor or Administrator of the estate (the “personal representative” in the words of the Legislature), here are some preliminary tips for getting off to the right start:

Grieve First

When someone dies, there is no real deadline for filing his or her Will or otherwise opening the estate.  The Clerk of Court would prefer that you do so within 90 days, but in reality, the Clerk is not going to turn you away if it takes you a little longer than that to get started.  Be with your family, attend to the funeral arrangements, and don’t worry about opening the estate until you are ready to proceed.  Serving as a personal representative can be a difficult job, and you should have a clear head before beginning the process.

Don’t Give Away Any Assets

It can be tempting to go ahead and start distributing money or other items to a deceased person’s heirs, especially if there are specific items listed in a Will or if the heirs are pressuring you for their share.  The best practice is to wait until you are ready to settle the estate or at least until you have information concerning the deceased’s debts.  If the person dies leaving behind medical bills, credit cards, taxes, or other debts that can’t otherwise be paid, you will be held personally responsible for reimbursing the estate for the value of any items or money that you gave away.  You will usually know what debts are out there within three or four months after you’ve opened the estate file at the courthouse, so everybody just needs to be patient until then.

Keep Accurate Records

One of your most important duties as a personal representative is to complete and file estate accountings with Court.  Do yourself a favor and hang on to every bank statement, cancelled check, receipt, invoice, or other financial document that crosses your path.  I once put a lot of time into compiling final account documents in a complicated estate, only to discover that in between drafting the documents and receiving the final bank statement from the estate bank account, the bank paid interest into that account in the amount of one cent ($0.01).  Because of that one-penny difference, I had to go back and redo the paperwork before the Court would accept it.  Take the job of personal representative seriously from the start and you’ll save yourself a lot of headaches in the end.

October 23, 2011 Posted by | Uncategorized | , , , | Leave a comment

You Got Served

OK, before you get too excited, this blog post is not about a breakdancing competition.  I had some friends in middle school who could probably write volumes on that topic, but I was never that coordinated.  Rather, this post is about what you should do when you’ve been served with a lawsuit.  Although service of a lawsuit can be accomplished using certified mail, service most often occurs when a Sheriff’s deputy arrives at your home and hands a summons and complaint (a lawsuit) to you.  First of all, don’t get frightened or upset about the officer arriving at your house.  The deputies are professionals who do this every day – they are not there to upset or judge you, they just have to hand the paperwork to somebody and then they move on to the next address.  A couple of tips if this ever happens to you:

Read the Paperwork

I’ve had lots of clients over the years who got served with a lawsuit and never bothered to even read any of it.  Many clients have even thrown the paperwork away without looking at it.  Here’s a general rule of thumb:  Whether it’s Luca Brasi handing Johnny Fontaine’s contract to the bandleader or a Deputy Sheriff handing you a summons, when somebody with a gun puts a stack of papers in front of you, you really should at least take a look at it.  Something delivered in that fashion is almost always going to be something important and you should take the time to read it.

Luca says always read your legal documents.

There have been countless occasions where the wrong person is being sued in a lawsuit, either by accident or on purpose.  For example, there are many lawsuits that should legally be filed against a corporation, but the case gets filed against the owners of the corporation instead.  There are many others where a debt is owed by only one person, but the lawsuit is filed against both that person and his/her spouse.  I have even had to ask judges to sanction plaintiffs (the person suing you) and/or their attorneys because they have knowingly sued the wrong person, hoping that the defendant (the person being sued) won’t read the lawsuit and just allow a judgment to be entered against him or her.  Even if the right person is being sued, a lawsuit could be asking for more money than is really owed, and if you don’t read it, you may end up paying a lot more than you should.

Don’t Miss the Deadline to Respond

From the time you receive the summons, you only have 30 days to file an answer to the lawsuit.  If you don’t respond, you lose.  That’s it, case closed.  There will be no hearing scheduled and you will not get your day in court.  After 30 days, a judgment will be entered against you and the person who sued you will begin the process for having the Sheriff’s Department collect the amount of the judgment from you.  I have received many phone calls from people who tell me that they can’t possibly have a judgment against them because they never received notice of any court date.  Unfortunately, those folks found out too late that this is not true.  Failing to respond makes you liable for anything contained in the lawsuit, whether it’s true or not, and you may have no opportunity to defend yourself if you don’t respond within the 30-day time limit.  So, do yourself a favor – read the paperwork, and if there’s anything untrue in there, make sure you or your attorney file a response on time.

August 15, 2011 Posted by | Litigation | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Bankruptcy Myth #1: You Will Lose Your House

This is the first in a series of posts about bankruptcy myths – things I hear over and over again from clients that just aren’t true.  Most of the time, clients have heard these myths, and believed them, from co-workers, neighbors, relatives, or other sources.  Basically, they’ve heard these ideas from everyone under the sun, except for a bankruptcy attorney.

One of the myths I hear most often from clients is that if you file bankruptcy, the Bankruptcy Court or mortgage company will automatically take your house.  In the vast majority of cases, especially in this real estate market, this rumor is simply not true.  There’s no good source to find hard numbers as to how often the Bankruptcy Court actually ends up selling a debtor’s residence, but most Chapter 7 filers who wish to keep their home and keep making the payments on their mortgage are allowed to do so.  I’m only discussing Chapter 7 bankruptcies here, because the Court doesn’t ever take any property from debtors in a Chapter 13 case, which is often filed for the express purpose of saving the debtor’s home from foreclosure.

Now, it is possible to lose your home in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, it’s just not very likely in most cases.  The reason it’s unlikely is because of the generous homestead exemption (N.C.G.S. sec. 1C-1601(a)(1)) that bankruptcy filers and judgment debtors enjoy in the State of North Carolina.  Exemption is just the legal term for the amount of property that you get to keep; what can’t be taken away from you when you either file bankruptcy or have a civil judgment entered against you.  In North Carolina, each person gets to keep $35,000.00 equity in his/her residence, and a married couple who owns their house jointly gets $35,000.00 each for a total of $70,000.00 that is protected.

To find the amount of equity in your home, estimate the fair market value of your home and then subtract the amount owed on all of your mortgages – the remaining amount is the equity.  Calculating the amount owed on your mortgages is the easy part, but determining fair market value can be tricky, because it’s not necessarily what you paid for your home 6 years ago, or what it was appraised for when you refinanced 3 years ago, and it usually isn’t exactly what the tax value of your home is either.  Fair market value is what you could sell your house for, and in this awful real estate market, it would be very difficult, in most cases, to sell your home for $70,000.00 (or even $35,000.00) more than what you owe on it.  Some county tax websites (e.g. Wake County) will provide a list of other houses that have sold in your neighborhood recently and tell you what the sales prices were.  Where only one spouse is filing and the spouses have no joint unsecured debts (usually credit cards or medical bills), the exemption for home equity is unlimited if the home is owned by both spouses, meaning that the couple could keep the house no matter how much it’s worth.

The point is, don’t put off talking to a bankruptcy attorney because you think you’d lose your home.  That outcome is very rare, and it’s not something that happens by surprise because a competent attorney is going to discuss this issue with you in depth before any papers are ever filed.  With many attorneys offering free consultations for bankruptcy matters, you have nothing to lose by asking.

August 7, 2011 Posted by | Bankruptcy | , , , , , | Leave a comment

It’s Alive

With the publication of this first post, The Garner Lawyer blog is officially alive and kicking.  While the plan for this blog is to discuss any and all areas of the law, the areas in which I have practiced will probably appear more often in the rotation than others.  Fortunately, I practice in a wide variety of areas, including the following:  bankruptcy, foreclosure, wills and estates, adoptions and guardianships, real estate, incorporations, and various types of civil litigation.  In the few areas of the law in which I don’t practice, I have access to plenty of lawyers who do, either within my own firm or elsewhere, so there’s no real limit to the potential topics available.

August 5, 2011 Posted by | Uncategorized | 1 Comment

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.